Veritas Editorial

This editorial explains how research integrity must be embedded into the architecture of evaluation systems rather than treated as an external ethical add-on. It outlines how indicator design, aggregation logic, and governance mechanisms can structurally safeguard responsible research assessment.

This editorial explains how scoring scales influence the interpretation of research evaluation indicators, clarifying how scale design, normalization, and presentation shape meaning and affect responsible comparison.

This editorial explains why indicator weighting is an inherently methodological choice rather than a neutral mathematical step, outlining how weighting shapes interpretation, introduces evaluative assumptions, and requires transparency and governance to ensure responsible use of composite research scores.